"Amazon preparing for a battle,'' by Pierre-Eugène-Emile Hébert, at the National Gallery of Art, in Washington, D.C.
Adapted from "Robert Whitcomb's "Digital Diary,'' in GoLocal24com:
Rhode Island Gov. Gina Raimondo promised in her well-intentioned pitch to Amazon to build its “second headquarters’’ in the state that “You’d {Amazon} have the access, influence and impact that comes from being a dominant employer in our state.’’
This (along with a bizarre rendering showing Amazon buildings taking over much of the area around the State House) is a tad chilling. Does a tiny state want to take orders from some huge company?
Of course it would be very nice to get some Amazon jobs. With Boston a leading (and perhaps the leading) candidate to get the company’s second headquarters, perhaps Greater Providence could get some spillover employees from the behemoth online retailer, especially in such specialties as design, in which Rhode Island has particular strengths. But it’s dangerous for democracy and long-term, steady economic growth to be at the beck and call of one huge company. Better 50 small and medium size companies than one huge quasi-monopoly. Big company means big hiring but also eventually big layoffs.
Some Amazon executives are reportedly pushing hard for Boston to be the second headquarters. To learn more, please hit this link:
https://www.cnbc.com/2017/09/12/amazon-execs-want-second-hq-in-boston-says-report.html
