Llewellyn King: God save us from our cowardly Congress

The former Londonderry Arms, now called the Harbourview Hotel.

WEST WARWICK, R.I.

October 1989 found me in a small hotel, the Londonderry Arms, on the Antrim  Coast of Northern Ireland. It was during “The Troubles” and evidence of  the sectarian strife was everywhere, even along that beautiful  shoreline, complete as it is with the Giant’s Causeway, one of Northern  Ireland’s big tourist attractions.

My wife, Linda Gasparello, and I were reminded of the bitter divisions  between Protestants and Catholics when we were stopped by British  soldiers at a roadblock. They were polite and checked our papers. While  they were doing that, Linda said, “Aren’t those soldiers vulnerable,  standing like that in the open road?”

“Take a look over there,” I replied.

Just as I knew there would be, there was a soldier in a ditch with a machine gun trained on us and offering cover to the troops.

It was a reminder of just how bad things were in Northern Ireland at the  time with frequent murders, kneecapping, and a lack of any communication between Protestants and Catholics. One people divided by their  religious and historical burden.

The Londonderry Arms was a hotel of historic importance, having once been  owned briefly by Winston Churchill and which was operated from 1948  until last year by the legendary O’Neill family.

We had been warmly welcomed and made at home by Frankie O’Neill. After  dinner at the hotel, he came to me and said, “I am afraid I won’t be  able to be with you after today because I am taking my sister to  Washington to see the Congress at work.”


“Why?” I asked.


One could imagine traveling to Washington to see the museums, the White  House and the Capitol. But Congress in session, that querulous place  with its confusing systems and norms?

Then he explained that the Northern Ireland Parliament, called Stormont,  after Stormont Castle where it meets, is based on the British House of  Commons where party discipline is rigid. Under a parliamentary  system, the government of the day would fall if there were no party  discipline. If you are Labor, you vote Labor; if Conservative, you vote  Conservative. Only very occasionally is there a free vote on a moral  issue, like the death penalty.

That meant, O’Neill told me, that in Northern Ireland, Catholics and  Protestants were on opposite sides of the aisle and the government was  always at a standstill. 

He thought that the American legislative system, with its ability to  incorporate minority views, and for minorities to introduce and  pass legislation of interest only to a fragment of the population, was a beacon for Ireland.

I don’t think that O’Neill would take his sister to Washington today to see  the Congress as it is now: inglorious, pusillanimous, fawning men and  women more concerned with their own job protection than discharging the  high duty of the House and the Senate. Worse, its magnificent  independence has been traded for obsequious party loyalty.

Of course, the lickspittle members of Congress at present are the  wretched, obsequious, groveling Republicans who have enabled President  Trump to trample the Constitution and usurp the powers of Congress.

But one has to say the Democrats are hardly admirable, not exactly an  impressive body of leaders. In their way, they are humbled by their own  diminished concept of the role of the loyal opposition.

The Republicans may be the more guilty invertebrates, but the equivalence  of the Democrats is also noteworthy in this sad abrogation of  responsibility that has taken hold of the political class in Congress.  Look no further than Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer’s failure of  courage in throwing in with the Republicans to keep the government open. It was political will withering in plain sight.

As someone who was covering Congress at the time of O’Neill’s declaration  about the superiority of Congress as a democratic legislating  arrangement, I have seen that great body subsume the national interest  to personal job security and fear of criticism from on high, the White  House.

The great thing at that time was the individualism of members of Congress,  who had a keen eye to their constituents and what they felt was the  national interest. 

Sadly, that grand time of free-for-all legislating came to an end when Newt  Gingrich took up the House speaker’s gavel in 1994 and introduced a  concept of party discipline more appropriate to Westminster than to  Capitol Hill. Shame.

On Twitter: @llewellynking2

Llewellyn King is executive producer and host of White House Chronicle, on PBS, and an international energy-sector consultant and speaker. He’s based in Rhode Island.


White House Chronicle

Previous
Previous

“Spider at His Trade again’

Next
Next

Boston’s housing-creation Drought worsens